_170

Be Kind Rewind

  • Trust Weighted Very Good
  • 20 Trust Points
Comedy Drama

On Demand

Netflix On Demand

Amazon Instant Video On Demand

$2.99 Rental

iTunes On Demand

Rent from $2.99

YouTube

Not Available

Review Grid

Review-movie-btn-s
By Trust Created Help-s Summary Help-s Acting Help-s Film Help-s Edge Help-s Reality
TRUST WEIGHTED Help-s Very Good Great Very Good Risqué Glib
AVERAGE Good Good Good Risqué Supernatural
Very Good 3.5

Be Kind Rewind takes great actors and puts them in an amateur setting to center itself around us; the fans. Even though…

More »
Great 4.0

As a Jack Black fan, his performance in the film was very refreshing to see. It brought me back to School of Rock. Blac…

More »
Good 3.0

If all remakes were like the Be Kind Rewind films, than they would be a lot more fun to watch than majority of them we …

More »
Risqué 1.6

There really isn’t much violence in the film aside from a little bit of slapstick humor while they are making the videos.

More »
Glib 1.6

It reflects on the past and things that represent it in a reminiscent manner. Most importantly though the real feeling …

More »
Great 4.0
Really Great 4.5
Great 4.0
Risqué 1.7
Natural 1.0
Very Good 3.5

Amusingly watchable but messy and overwrought.

More »
Very Good 3.5
Great 4.0
Tame 1.0
Fantasy 5.0

Forum

Reply-btn
Subscribe to Be Kind Rewind 0 replies, 0 voices
No comments as yet.

SimilarMovies

Similar Movies based on genre, quality, and content Modify-filter-btn According to
Movie Released Genre Summary Trust
_70
Forrest Gump

1994

Comedy Drama

  • Trust Weighted

  •  

96

_70
Little Miss Sunshine

2006

Comedy Drama

  • Trust Weighted

  •  

66

_70
Ed Wood

1994

Comedy Drama

  • Trust Weighted

  •  

10

_70
Breakfast at Tiffany's

1961

Comedy Drama

  • Trust Weighted

  •  

3

VuLists containing Be Kind Rewind

  • 1 - 1 of 1
  • « First
  • Last »
  • ◄ PREVIOUS
  • NEXT ►
ViewList
Creator
Quality
Trust
Comments
Kelsey's Favorites (84)
Kelsey Dec 16, 2010 02:22AM PST
_40 _40 _40
Great 40 Points 0 Replies