• Trust Weighted Pretty Awful
  • 8 Trust Points

On Demand

Notify
Netflix On Demand

Amazon Instant Video On Demand

Not Available

iTunes On Demand

Rent from $3.99

YouTube

Tag Tree

Genre
Vibe
Setting
Protagonists
Demographic
Occaision
Production
Period
Source
Location

moviedude's Review

Created Dec 11, 2009 02:45PM PST • Edited Dec 11, 2009 02:45PM PST

  1. Quality
  2. Pretty Awful 0.5

    Why? Why ruin, trash, abuse, and render useless two sci-fi sagas but mashing them into a ball and trying to make money off of that ball, by breaking it into little pieces and selling the fragments?

  3. Barely OK 2.0

    Not much dialogue, and as I say for similar movies, more screaming than acting, but the acting that does show is mediocre.

  4. Male Stars Barely OK 2.0
  5. Female Stars OK 2.5
  6. Female Costars Barely OK 2.0
  7. Male Costars Barely OK 2.0
  8. Pretty Bad 1.5

    A stupendously bad film that defiles the classics in the worst way possible. “Why?” I ask again.

  9. Direction Bad 1.0
  10. Play Bad 1.0
  11. Music OK 2.5
  12. Visuals Very Good 3.5

    Good visuals and realistic looking battles. I’m only saying that about the action that is visible, because most is not, due to the pitch-black darkness.

  13. Content
  14. Sordid 2.7
  15. Sex Innocent 1.5
  16. Violence Savage 4.5

    Some savage violence indeed, however most takes place in the dark. You can still tell that the Predators slash, choke, and impale, and that the Aliens burn and penetrate their victims, though.

  17. Rudeness Salty 2.0
  18. Fantasy 5.0

    Aliens and Predators. How realistic is that?

  19. Circumstantial Fantasy 5.0
  20. Biological Fantasy 5.0
  21. Physical Fantasy 5.0

Forum

Subscribe to AVP: Alien Vs. Predator 1 reply, 1 voice
  • 1 - 1 of 1
  • « First
  • Last »
  • ◄ PREVIOUS
  • NEXT ►
Dec 11, 2009 4:41PM
Wick

Regarding moviedude’s Review
“Aliens and Predators. How realistic is that?” :-)